Free - Beyond Collapse

Wednesday, March 30, 2011

Breaking News-NWO:The Real Reason They Want Gaddafi Gone From Libya

The Coalition of Globalists are not interested in sheltering the Libyan people from Muammar al- Gaddafi. The no-fly zone and attacks on the Libyan military by NATO and U.S. have nothing to do with democracy and free elections.


It’s about oil – and who owns it.


In 2009 Gaddafi Proposed Nationalizing Libya’s Oil majorforeign


In 2009, Gaddafi uttered the “N” word – nationalization. Not only for Libya’s oil, but all oil in the region. For the globalists, this made Gaddafi a dangerous mad dog renegade who needed to be replaced.


“The oil-exporting countries should opt for nationalization because of the rapid fall in oil prices. We must put the issue on the table and discuss it seriously,” he declared. “Oil should be owned by the State at this time, so we could better control prices by the increase or decrease in production.”


Predictably, Gaddafi’s pronouncement set off alarm bells at Anglo-Dutch Shell, British Petroleum, ExxonMobil, Hess Corp., Marathon Oil, Occidental Petroleum and ConocoPhillips, the Spanish Repsol, Germany’s Wintershall, Austria’s OMV, Norway’s Statoil, Eni and Canada’s Petro Canada.


The year before, the Libyan state oil company, National Oil, prepared a report on the subject in which officials suggested modifying the production-sharing agreements with foreign companies in order to increase state revenues, according to a report posted on the Pravdawebsite.


After implementing contract changes, Libya gained 5.4 billion dollars in oil revenues.


Gaddafi’s plan was reported on by Reuters and the corporate media.


In addition to calling for nationalization, the Libyan leader called for support of his proposal to dismantle the government and to distribute the oil wealth directly to Libya’s 5 million citizens.



State bureaucrats, however, rejected the idea because they feared for the loess of their cushy jobs and also feared the wrath of transnational oil corporations and the banks that own them.


Prime Minister al-Baghdadi, Ali al-Mahmoudi and Farhat Omar Bin Guida, of Libya’s Central Bank, told Gaddafi the measure would wreck the country’s economy in lead to “capital flight,” in other words the globalists pulling their money out of the country.


“The Administration has failed and the state’s economy has failed. Enough is enough. The solution is for the Libyan people to directly receive oil revenues and decide what to do with them,” Gaddafi said in a speech broadcast on state television. To this end, the Libyan leader urged a radical reform of government bureaucracy.


The government, however, voted to reject Gaddafi’s plan to turn ownership of the country’s oil over to the people. 64 ministers from a total of 468 Popular Committee members voted for the measure.


“My dream during all these years was to give the power and wealth directly to the people,” said Gaddafi in response to the rejection.


In 1953, the United States and Britain plotted to overthrow the democratically elected government of Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh, who had promised to nationalize the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company and give the profits to the Iranian people. Mosaddegh attempted to negotiate with the AIOC, but the company rejected his proposed compromise.


In order to sell a coup, Britain persuaded Secretary of State John Foster Dulles that Iran was going over to the Soviets. Then president Truman was cool to the idea, but in 1953, when Dwight D. Eisenhower became president, the UK convinced him to a joint coup d’├ętat. The CIA was dispatched to destabilize the country, get rid of Mosaddegh, and install the brutal dictator Mohammad-Reza Shah Pahlavi and his secret police, the SAVAK.


For the mistake of suggesting oil profits be returned to the Libyan people, Muammar al-Gaddafi is now suffering a likewise fate.

Original Article

4 comments:

  1. oil exploration and development is an expensive and risky business. So the companies that do it rightly demand a percentage of the revenue.
    Libya gets plenty of money for its oil and so it would be totally unjustified in nationalisation. i.e. let the oil companies take the risk and spend the money on discovery and then steal all the profits.
    This article completely ignores the fact that intervention was only agreed when Ghaddafi started to kill his own people with planes.
    Talk about a nonsense article.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Yes a percentage of the revenue that makes them profit more than any other business on the planet. The citizens of a nation should make the most profit from any resource in their land because it is rightfully theirs but instead the oil companies are the ones stealing the profits. If intervention is based on innocent lives lost then why not invade Bahrain or prevent Saudia Arabia from killing unarmed protesters. Your argument is full of shit. There is a global agenda and they must never win.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh and bye the way, The above comment calling this article a waste, came from the British branch of JP Morgan Chase Executive offices, a big holder of BP and other oil company interests...talk about the NWO!!! Just thought I would let everyone know where this came from. lol

    ReplyDelete
  4. Your chops eat shit get out of africa there is nothing for you here if I see one yankee army cross the sadic FATALITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete